
Study: Deepfake fraud surges – and only 7% of organizations are firmly ready
Manal Saleh
Global
survey finds organizations under-equipped as AI-charged threats escalate across
industries
Dubai,
United Arab Emirates – April 22, 2026: As
fraudsters sprint ahead with AI, organizations report they are struggling to
keep pace. That’s the sobering verdict delivered in the latest fraud research by
the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) and data and AI leader
SAS: Only 7% of anti-fraud professionals say their organizations
are more than moderately prepared to detect or prevent AI-fueled fraud –
even as criminals hijack inexpensive and plentiful AI tools to drive social
engineering schemes, digital forgery and consumer scams to record highs.
The 2026
Anti-Fraud Technology Benchmarking Report – the fourth installment
in a research series debuted by the ACFE and SAS in 2019 – is based on a survey
of 713 fraud fighters across eight regions worldwide.
“The data paints a
worrisome picture: fraud is evolving faster than most organizations can defend
against it,” said John Gill, J.D., CFE, President of the ACFE. “AI-powered
threats aren’t on the horizon – they’re already here, and they’re accelerating
quickly. The profession has made real strides in adopting AI, but this report
is a wake-up call. Organizations that don’t strengthen their defenses against
AI-charged fraud risk as others do will become bigger targets.”
As fraud
risk rises globally, the UAE and Saudi Arabia are uniquely positioned to lead
the next generation of fraud prevention. Strong regulatory alignment,
government-led digital transformation, and modern financial infrastructure give
both markets a structural advantage. With central banks CBUAE and SAMA acting
as ecosystem orchestrators, the region has a rare opportunity to leapfrog
legacy approaches and move directly to supporting a secure, seamless, and
future-ready financial ecosystem.
“Few
regions combine high growth with such strong regulatory leadership,” said Abed
Hamandi, Senior Director, EMEA Consulting, Fraud and Security Intelligence
Practice, SAS. “The
UAE and Saudi Arabia are not constrained by legacy in the same way as many
mature markets. By embracing real-time, AI-driven, and identity-centric fraud
prevention, they can stop fraud before it happens, while delivering the
low-friction customer experiences that modern digital economies demand.”
Industries
at a crossroads – and in the crosshairs
Respondents
represent more than a dozen industries, most prominently government and public
sector (26%) and banking and financial services (23%), alongside meaningful
participation from professional services, manufacturing, insurance, technology,
education, energy and health care. Survey insights reveal that:
·
Fraudsters
are winning the AI race. Every AI-powered
fraud modality examined has risen over the past two years, according to the
anti-fraud professionals surveyed. Deepfake social engineering saw the sharpest
surge, with 77% of respondents reporting a slight-to-significant increase –
followed closely by consumer fraud/scams (75%), generative AI document
fraud/forgery (75%) and deepfake digital injection (72%). Looking ahead, 55%
expect deepfake social engineering and GenAI document fraud/forgery to increase
significantly over the next 24 months.
·
AI and
machine learning (ML) adoption are accelerating but remain far from ideal. One-quarter
of organizations (exactly 25%) now use AI/ML in their anti-fraud programs,
according to respondents, up from 18% in 2024. Another 28% expect to adopt it
by 2028. For organizations still on the sidelines, the window to build AI
competency before competitors and criminals widen the gap is narrowing fast.
·
Governance
lags dangerously behind AI adoption. Nearly
nine in 10 (86%) organizations rate accuracy of results as important or very
important in adopting GenAI, yet less than one in five (18%) respondents say
their organization tests AI models for bias or fairness. Similarly, 82% say
explainability is important, but just 6% feel completely confident explaining
how their AI/ML models make anti-fraud decisions. For banks, insurers and other
regulated entities in particular, deploying AI in this manner risks regulatory
consequences and legal liability on top of reputational damage.
·
Budgets
are growing – but so are constraints. More
than half of respondents (55%) expect their organizations to increase their anti-fraud technology budgets over the next two years.
Even so, budgetary and financial restrictions remain the leading barrier to
implementation, cited as a major or moderate challenge by 84% of respondents.
Emerging
tech: Promise, progress and the cost of waiting
Physical
biometrics, agentic and generative AI – and yes, even quantum AI – the technologies transforming
the war on fraud are maturing rapidly. But fraudsters’ readiness to exploit
them is advancing in parallel, and bad actors have a tremendous advantage.
“Cybercriminals
don’t have governance committees, and they don’t wait for budget cycles or
regulatory clarity – they just act,” said Stu Bradley, Senior Vice
President of Risk, Fraud and Compliance Solutions at SAS. “Every quarter
business leaders spend evaluating a technology is another quarter lawbreakers
get to weaponize it and find organizations underprepared.”
The
question isn’t whether to adopt anti-fraud innovations, but rather, can
organizations afford to wait? The study revealed these trends in value-proven,
emerging technologies:
·
GenAI is
moving from aspiration to application. Although
only 16% of respondents indicate their organizations currently use generative AI as an anti-fraud tool,
another 58% plan to in the future. Among those already using GenAI, top
applications are phishing and scam detection (49%), risk
identification/assessment (46%) and report writing (45%).
·
AI agents are
hotter still. Nearly one in 10 (8%) of
respondents say their organizations use agentic AI for fraud fighting, and
nearly one-third (31%) more expect to deploy it by 2028 – the highest near-term
adoption expectation of any emerging technology category examined.
·
Physical
biometrics leads emerging tech adoption – while many neglect the benefits of
automation and the cloud. The use of physical
biometrics is now the most widely adopted emerging technology in anti-fraud
programs gauged in the study, used by nearly half of organizations (45%)
surveyed – up from roughly one-third (34%) in 2022. In contrast, cloud-native fraud
detection platforms and automation remain significantly underutilized, used by
only 10% and 29% of organizations, respectively.
·
Quantum
computing’s impact on the anti-fraud battlefield is closer than most expect. Most
respondents (62%) expect quantum computing and quantum AI to materially impact fraud
detection and prevention by 2030 – and a surprising 11% say it already is.
Ready or
not…
Whatever
their level of preparedness, organizations across sectors face the same
AI-accelerated fraud threats. The differentiator? Their ability to fight back.
Fraud fighters must be equipped with the right data and technology – and also
the appropriate speed, scale and governance – to combat modern-day risks.
Explore the most prominent AI-accelerated fraud modalities and counter
strategies by downloading the ACFE and SAS’ joint 2026 Anti-Fraud
Technology Benchmarking Report at SAS.com/fraudreport.
For a hands-on exploration of the survey data – with
filters for region, industry, respondent profile and more – investigate the
data dashboard at SAS.com/fraudsurvey.
--Ends--
About the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE)
Founded in 1988 by Dr. Joseph T. Wells, CFE, CPA, the ACFE
is the world’s largest anti-fraud organization. Together with more than 95,000
members, the ACFE works to reduce business fraud worldwide and inspire public
confidence in the integrity and objectivity within the profession. For more
information, visit ACFE.com.
SAS is a
global leader in data and AI. With SAS software and industry-specific
solutions, organizations transform data into trusted decisions. SAS gives you
THE POWER TO KNOW®.
SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service
names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc. in
the USA and other countries. ®
indicates USA registration. Other brand and
product names are trademarks of their respective companies. Copyright © 2026
SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved.
.jpeg)







